A commentary on a randomized controlled trial examines the effectiveness of manual versus powered toothbrushes in improving gingival health among individuals with disabilities. The original study, conducted by Sinha et al. (2024), found no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the two brushing methods. However, participants expressed a strong preference for powered toothbrushes, citing factors such as ease of use, sensory comfort, and the ability to maintain autonomy.

The commentary integrates findings from behavioral, psychological, and health systems literature, emphasizing the importance of patient-centered care. It highlights that while clinical outcomes may be similar, the experiences and preferences of patients are crucial in promoting adherence and satisfaction with oral health practices. The authors argue that honoring these preferences is essential for achieving sustainable, person-centered care.

In conclusion, the commentary stresses that patient preferences should be prioritized in oral health promotion strategies, particularly for individuals with disabilities. This approach can enhance engagement and equity in healthcare delivery, ensuring that care is tailored to the unique needs and preferences of each patient.