A significant ruling from Washington’s Court of Appeals has changed how trial courts handle gun surrender in domestic violence cases. The case, Dela Llana v. Holiwell, involved Grenadinah Dela Llana seeking a domestic violence protection order against Darrion Holiwell, a former sheriff’s deputy. Despite a court order for Holiwell to surrender his firearms, he claimed he had none, even though records indicated he owned 70 guns. Over two years, the trial court found Holiwell in contempt multiple times but struggled to enforce compliance. Eventually, the court issued a $100,000 fine, which had little effect due to Holiwell’s claimed financial status.

The Court of Appeals reversed this decision, ruling that courts must ensure “timely and complete compliance” with weapon surrender orders. The burden is on the abuser to prove compliance, and courts can use strict measures, including jail time, to enforce these orders. This ruling establishes a precedent, emphasizing that survivors are at a significantly higher risk of harm when abusers have access to firearms. The ruling aims to enhance accountability for abusers and protect survivors, ensuring that excuses for non-compliance are no longer tolerated.